Advertisements
Feeds:

Archive for July, 2008

Golden Retriever’s Origins

Here’s an article I wrote on the Origins of the Golden Retriever.

I will have a blog entry within the next week explaining in further detail why I doubt the story of the bloodhound cross in goldens, because it comes from Elma Stonex, the breed historian who exposed the Russian circus dog malarky, second hand. In that second hand source, it says that the dogs from the bloodhound (St. Hubert Hound) cross were aggressive. Bloodhounds (St. Hubert Hounds) are NOT aggressive dogs. They are not really trainable, but one thing they are not is aggressive. In fact, the only hounds that are aggressive are the curs (including the Catahoula Leopard Dog), some of the German hounds, the Plott hound (which is a German-derived hound), and dachshunds (and they aren’t THATaggressive).

I also have another article here on the Treeing Walker Coonhound. The person who started this title at Helium thought that this breed is the same as the Walker Hound, which is actually the ancestor of the Treeing Walker. The Walker hound is an early line of American Foxhound, which was descended froma pack of foxhounds brought to Virginia in 1742 by Thomas Walker. This was one of the earliest imports of European hounds to the colonies.

I do know my scent hounds, having grown up in the scent hound capital of North America. I believe we are second only to France in the number of hound breeds we have created!

I also have one here on my own dogs, which is personal without being romantic portrayal of growing up with farm dogs. I have included my first golden retriever in this essay.

I hope you like them!

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Golden Retriever History II– The Wavy-Coated Retriever

This is a depiction of a St. John's Water Dog with long hair. Most breed historians discount the long haired variety of this particular breed, but this variety played an important role in the development of the wavy-coated retriever, the ancestral variety for both golden retriever and the flat-coat.

This is a depiction of a St. John's Water Dog with long hair. Most breed historians discount the long haired variety of this particular breed, but this variety played an important role in the development of the wavy-coated retriever, the ancestral variety for both golden retriever and the flat-coat.

The wavy-coated retriever is an important early retriever breed. It is the ancestral variety to both the golden retriever and the flat-coat, and it is an important out-cross to the Labrador retriever.

The wavy-coat descends from the St. John’s Water Dog, which may have had long-haired dogs in its type. This breed is credited with being ancestral to all retrievers, except the curly-coat, which was in development before this breed from the island of Newfoundland (the island part of the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador) was imported to Britain. (The curly probably was crossed with this dog at some point, however). The wavy-coat was developed when the word retriever described a function rather than a breed. Any dog that picked up shot game could be a retriever. Collies, setters, pointers, land spaniels, and water spaniels were all probably used as retrievers and cross-bred. The St. John’s Water dog just happened to be a very good retriever dog, and it became the ur dog from which all retrievers eventually were developed.

The early retrievers looked something like this:

a cross between a water spaniel and setter, and two crosses between a setter and a St. John's Water Dog.

At the top is a cross between a water spaniel and a St.John's Water dog; From left to right: a cross between a water spaniel and setter, and two crosses between a setter and a St. John's Water Dog.

This picture comes from a bookby a British officer named William Nelson Hutchinson called Dog Breaking: The Most Expeditious, Certain, and Easy Methods, an early encyclopedia of training hunting dogs of all types. The dogs at the bottom are typical of early wavy-coats, while the dog at the top is probably a good clue about how the curly-coated retriever developed once the St. John’s Water Dog was imported. In the original, where I have put the word “St. John’s Water Dog,” the author had the word “Newfoundland.” I changed it because at the time the words were interchangeable, but today, Newfoundland dog is a large mastiff type dog derived from this breed and bred from the late eigthteenth century to the mid-nineteenth century as a fad family pet.  The modern dog called the Newfoundland has many genetic problems, which came from overbreeding as a much larger dog. It has a gentle temperament, but it lacks most of its original working instincts. This should be a warning to all retriever lovers, especially those who like the working instincts and healthy bodies of working retrievers. The same thing is happening to our dogs.

The wavy-coat began as a St. John’s Water Dog and setter cross. Something like this:

This dog is listed as a setter/retriever cross. It's probably a cross between a short-haired St. John's Water Dog and a setter. It is typical of early wavy-coats.

This dog is listed as a setter/retriever cross. It's probably a cross between a short-haired St. John's Water Dog and a setter. It is typical of early wavy-coats.

These dogs became rather popular among the shooting estates. The short-haired St. Johns Water Dogs that existed in Newfoundland at that time were held by very few people in England. The short-haired variety was more common in Newfoundland at the time, because the long-haired variety tended to get bogged down in ice.  Short-haired dogs can swim faster. However, most British gentry had wavy-coats derived from the long-haired dogs of this type and setter crosses. It would make sense, then, that the Newfoundland fishermen were more likely to export long-haired puppies from their Water Dog litters. However, the short-haired variety did make to England, and were used extensively in the development of the Labrador.

The wavy-coat’s other important ancestor was the setter. However, at this time, there were more breeds of setter than the three that exist right now. Welsh black setters were common on shooting estates, and they were certainly used in the Wavy-coated cross. Another variety existed called the Featherstone Castle setter in Scotland that produced yellow and light red setters that were probably also used in the development of the Tweed water spaniel. Gordon setters were in development here, too, and solid red gordon setters were not unknown. All of these, along with the Irish setters (solid red and red and white weren’t separate breeds) and English setters (of all strains), were crossed with the St. John’s water dog. As a result of crossing with setters, genes for yellow and red were introduced into the wavy-coat.

During most of the nineteenth century, black retrievers were the preferred color. Blacks were supposedly easier to train.  Yellow or red puppies were culled or drowned.

One reddish colored wavy coat was born to the Earl of Chichester in 1864. Instead of being killed, he was given in lieu of a debt to a cobbler at Brighton. The cobbler had no real use for a working retriever, but he kept him as a pet. Dudley Coutts Marjoribanks happened upon this dog and offered to buy him from the cobbler in 1865. Marjoribanks was a Liberal MP for Berwick-upon-Tweed and had a large shooting estate in Inverness-shire called “Guisachan.”  Marjoribanks’s title was 1st Baron Tweedmouth, and that man would start the first strain of yellow wavy-coats, which would effect the devlopment of the wavy-coated breed and, later, the flat-coated breed, as well.

This concludes Golden Retriever History II. I will begin with the actual development of the golden retriever from that reddish wavy-coat named “Nous,” which means wisdom.

Read Full Post »

Domestication Criteria

Not all animals can be domesticated.

Here is an article on why some animals were domesticated and others were not.

Because of this, we probably won’t have domesticated polar bears or warthogs. We’ll never have a domesticated cheetah, even though it was attempted in several parts of the cheetah’s range. Cheetahs are faster than any sight hound over a short distance. Cheetahs are even tractable if imprinted on humans. However, cheetahs are nearly impossible to breed in captivity. Male cheetahs have a very low sperm count, in part because all cheetahs are so inbred.

BTW, because I’m on cheetahs for a minute, Cheetahs once lived in Asia. Today, the last Asiatic Cheetahs are found in Iran.

Read Full Post »

Zomarick’s Golden History with English Subtitles

Here it is again with English subtitles.

Thanks again to Djanick Michaud of Zomarick Golden Retrievers.

Read Full Post »

Another theory of Domestic Dog Origins

Before I get comments denouncing me for putting a post on Coppinger’s theory, I need to make some things clear. Coppinger argues for a self-domesticating dog that evolved from the wolf because wolves that lacked fear of humans were better able to scavenge off of people. This happened when hunter-gatherer humans began to form the earliest agricultural settlements and were able to stay in one place. He bases this theory on the fact that wolves are almost impossible to domesticate. Wolf puppies must be captured early, as in within a few days of their eyes opening, in order to become imprinted on people. Modern domestic dogs can become imprinted on humans up to three months of age. I think Coppinger is a great behavioral ecologist, and he does apply the methodology of behavioral ecology to domestic animals.

However, there are some holes in his thesis. One is I have read several historical records of wolves living in North America during the early years of settlement.  The Diaries of Lewis and Clark is a great account of wolves living on the Great Plains. Their behavior is very different from modern wolves, which absolutely fear humans and avoid us at all costs. These wolves were curious of people, and I believe one wolf was killed with a knife during this adventure, Modern wolves will kill domestic dogs that roam into their territory, although it’s not a hard and fast rule (very few things with wolves is).  Lewis’s dog, “Seaman,” a Newfoundland (a bit different from the modern breed), never suffered attacks from wolves. I think the difference is this. Wolves in Europe, North America, and Asia have suffered a great persecution. It’s like the selection of Belyaev in reverse. The only wolves that remain are descended from ancestors who were nervous enough to avoid man. How this affects the way wolves develop as pups can only be up for conjecture.

It is possible that wolves living at the time when humans were hunters and gatherers were curious about people.  Their pups possibly had a longer period for imprinting. This could easily lead to hunter-gatherers keeping wolves as pets. BTW, pet keeping is something known to all people, except the Bushmen (San) in their original state. The natives of Australia kept dingo pups as pets. Women would nurse them as their own babies. However, once the dingo pups reached maturity, they were no longer fed. They would be released into the bush to fend for themselves. These were people without agriculture. However, they had a relationship with the dingo. The dingoes hunted on their own and were never used for hunting. The only purpose the dingoes provided was as a living blanket during the cold nights. The colder it got, the more dingoes were needed. A really cold night, might need three dingoes. Hince the name of the band “Three Dog Night.” This could explain some of the early interactions with humans and early dogs and ancient wolves.

However, again, this is largely speculation. We do know that dogs have been found that are older than the time period in which Coppinger postulates that dogs evolved from wolves, making the hunter-gatherer or “captured cub” thesis a little bit stronger.

James Serpell of the University of Pennsylvania promotes this theory of the dog’s origins. His book on dogs is easily the equal of the Coppingers’.

Read Full Post »

Wolves of the Northern Rockies

From ABC News.

Read Full Post »

Belyaev’s Fox Farm Experiment

Dmitri Belyaev was a Soviet geneticist who lived when the study genetics was repressed in the Soviet Union. Belyaev was sent to the Siberian city of Novosibirsk to do experiments on silver foxes to try and domesticate them for the fur trade. He also wanted to see if one could domesticate the red fox (the silver fox is a coloration of red fox) and possibly apply this to other animals that live in the colder regions of Russia.

Here’s a clip that shows what happened:

 

The foxes experienced changes that we might associate with domestic dogs. It happened remarkably fast and has led some theorists about canine evolution, such as Raymond Coppinger, to argue that dogs arose relatively quickly from a wolf population. The wolves that had the ability to feed near humans got to eat more food. Those wolves that were less likely to run away began to breed in a population, and these became the ancestors of the domestic dogs we have today. They experienced the same physiological changes that these foxes experienced.

Coppinger and his wife, Lorna, have written an interesting book on dog evolution. I would put it in my top ten list of dog books. It’s not a Lassie book. It’s hardcore behavioral ecology.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

%d bloggers like this: