
Virtually all working border collies used in trials are descended from this dog, "Wiston Cap."
The Canine Diversity Project is a site worth visiting.
How do we create genetic diversity?
We do it by introducing new bloodlines in a population.
Why do we need to do this?
Because diversity gives a population some room. It prevents genetic diseases from become so heavily concentrated in the population. Further, if a deadly new pathogen suddenly began to spread through the population, some of those individuals in that genetically diverse population might be resistant to it. The chance that this might happen is one reason why so many people are concerned about the genetic diversity of farm animals.
Zoos and breeding programs that produce endangered animals are always worried about genetic diversity. Inbred populations might have lower reproductive rates, as is the case with the cheetah, and the chance of a deadly pathogen killing off whole species is a major concern.
Until recently, dog people haven’t thought much about it. Genetic diversity in most purebred dogs has been reduced through the advent of organized competitions and an institutionalized fancy. Further, most registries use closed studbooks that only allow new dogs to enter the breeding population for a short time. After this time is past, it is very difficult to add new bloodlines, although they can be imported from similarly closed registries.
Dog shows are often blamed for the problem. Dog shows make certain male dogs rather famous. Male dogs can produce far more offspring than bitches can, and what often happens is that winning studs are used many times. This use of winning studs within a population reduces genetic diversity, simply because so many dogs have the same sire. Over time, the number of dogs with the same sire in their pedigree increases, and because these dogs are more likely to be winners, they are bred together. This problem can happen without deliberately inbreeding. If a great many dogs have the same sire, at some point, the progeny of these dogs wind up being bred together. If that sire was carrying a bad genetic disorder, you have increased the chance of large numbers of that particular dog population developing the disorder.
This problem is not confined to show dogs. In border collies, the popularity of sheepdog trials has had a similar effect. Virtually all working border collies today descend from a single sire, Wiston Cap. Border collies don’t have problems with an exaggerated body type, but they all pretty much have the same genetic disorders.
Although it is true that some species have survived great reductions in genetic diversity, such as the Northern Elephant Seal, which are all descended from a single male ancestor, it is not likely that dogs are going to be able to survive these severe reductions in genetic diversity. The wolves of Isle Royale (a long observed population) became severely inbred, and their population was unable to rebound for several years after the moose population dropped. Inbreeding is often suggested as one of the reasons for their inability to rebound once moose began to appear in higher numbers.
We need to really pay attention to genetic diversity in our dogs. It is as important as working conformation and temperament in ensuring the long-term viability of our beloved animals.




Too bad there isn’t a popular dam phenomenon instead of popular sire. It would be interesting to see the mitochondrial DNA in BCs if Wiston Cap had been a bitch instead of a dog (ignoring the fact that a dog can sire far more offspring than a single bitch can produce). I don’t know of a way to track a male’s offspring physically unless DNA testing was done all along.
The way they figured out it was Wiston Cap is that the BC organization in Britain had very good pedigrees.
The only way to follow a male’s genes physically is the y chromosome, but that not always the best way to do it, because only dog puppies get the y chromosome. My own dog was DNA certified to come from her particular sire.
There is a female phenomenon, too. In golden retrievers, this is more of a problem than in BC’s. Most golden bitches are not bred, mainly because golden owners tend to be politically correct people who believe very much in dog population control (You know the demographic. And for some reason, they love golden retrievers.) Those that are bred wind up producing on average only a single litter before being spayed. And this also winds up reducing genetic diversity. The sire issue winds up causing more immediate trouble. The dam problem is a slow bleed of genes.
I love you. In a man way. Straight man way. Any way, I have some links for you to check out.
http://www.bcdb.info/article2/wsn2.htm
The other articles there are also amazing and very informative. This guy has done what the registry should have done, and it’s pretty amazing that they haven’t shut him down.
He essentially scanned in all the studbooks, cleaned up the data, and created his own database.
The ABCA (the American working registry) doesn’t even publish their stud books. I can’t even get them to give me a report on how many border collies are registered each year broken down by state (the AKC offered this service for $20).
Really now, how can you be a decent dog registry if you can’t even tell me where your customers are coming from?
Anyone who can do a little math will find the above site fascinating. There’s nothing like putting all the theories to rest with actual data.
[…] is the Wiston Cap of working golden retrievers in this […]