B-17. Whoa.
“Dr” Hovind is also not a medical doctor.
Does he seriously think those people live to be 160?
Posted in Uncategorized on December 22, 2010 | 13 Comments »
B-17. Whoa.
“Dr” Hovind is also not a medical doctor.
Does he seriously think those people live to be 160?
Posted in creationism, evolution, tagged giraffe, intelligent design, recurrent (inferior) laryngeal nerve on December 22, 2010 | 20 Comments »
Part 2. (on Youtube, where you can find the rest)
The size and position of recurrent (inferior) laryngeal nerve is the death knell for ID.
I’m sorry.
Our is similarly positioned (and poorly “designed”), but ours isn’t redirected 15 feet as it is in the giraffe.
Posted in dog breeding, dog breeds, dog health, Uncategorized, tagged German shepherd dog, pedigree dogs exposed on December 22, 2010 | 15 Comments »
All the conversation about German shepherd dog conformation is really nothing without a video of the dogs walking.
Jemima Harrison uploaded this footage of some GSD’s at the Manchester Show in 2008:
GSD gait in slow motion:
Now, here is the footage from Pedigree Dogs Exposed in which a GSD fancier defends the anatomy of the show dogs:
The judge contends that the UK show dogs are correct because the breed standard says so. Of course, that standard was written by UK show GSD fanciers, not by people who were breeding working type dogs.
Breed standards can be a way of evaluating working conformation, but in the case of the GSD, the standard obviously is not a very good way at all.
Posted in dog domestication, wild dogs, wolves, tagged Mexican wolf, Teotihuacan, wolf hybrid, wolfdog on December 22, 2010 | 6 Comments »
From the LA Unleashed Blog:
Mexican researchers said Wednesday they have identified jawbones found in the pre-Hispanic ruins of Teotihuacan as those of wolf-dogs that were apparently crossbred as a symbol of the city’s warriors.
The National Institute of Anthropology and History said the jawbones were found during excavations in 2004 and are the first physical evidence of what appears to be intentional crossbreeding in ancient Mexican cultures.
The jawbones were found in a warrior’s burial at a Teotihuacan pyramid. Anthropological studies performed at Mexico’s National Autonomous University indicate the animal was a wolf-dog.
“In oral traditions and old chronicles, dog-like animals appear with symbols of power or divinity,” said institute spokesman Francisco De Anda. “But we did not have skeletal evidence … this is the first time we have proof.”
Wolf- or dog-like creatures appear in paintings at Teotihuacan, but had long been thought to be depictions of coyotes, which also inhabit the region. But archaeologists are now reevaluating that interpretation.
Several jawbones were made into a sort of decorative garment found on the warrior’s skeleton at the 2,000-year-old site north of Mexico City.
The wolf-dog apparently served as a symbol of strength and power.
Dogs and wolves are very similar genetically, and there has been evidence of ancient remains that may show natural crossbreeding.
But archaeologist Raul Valadez said the animal was the result of intentional selection. While the inhabitants of Teotihuacan had dogs, wolves and coyotes, they almost exclusively used wolf-dog bones in the ceremonial arrangement.
Of the bones found, eight were wolf-dog, three were dogs and two were crosses of coyotes and wolf-dogs.
These wolves would have likely been Canis lupus baileyi, which is now extinct in the wild in Mexico. They were actually known to hybridize with domestic dogs as the subspecies became rare in the wild. A whole line of these wolves that was kept at Carlsbad Caverns was euthanized under the suspicion that they were “contaminated” with dog blood. However, it was later found that these wolves had no evidence of dog hybridization in their MtDNA sequences.
This is yet another example of a gene flow between wild and domestic populations of Canis lupus, although the exact wild nature of these wolves is certainly in question. It is possible that these wolves lived in a state of semi-domestication. Historically, it hasn’t been very hard to habituate wolves to people, and it wouldn’t be very hard to breed an habituated wolf to a dog.
Or maybe they were urban wolves, like this one in Romania. Because there is no evidence of these people persecuting the wolves, they would have had more reason to hang around the city and have opportunities to breed with dogs.
The people of Teotihuacan were fairly good animal keepers. There is evidence that they were adept at keeping pumas and jaguars in captivity, so it would not be all that strange that they kept both wolves and coyotes in this manner.
Throughout their long history, dogs have retained some of their genetic diversity through wild blood. Now that wolves have been pushed very far from human societies,and dogs have undergone extensive selective breeding, these differences seem much more extreme than they once were.
But through much of that history, dog and wolf have bred with each other–sometimes intentionally, as seems to be the case here, and sometimes accidentally, as is likely the case with the evolution of black wolves in North America.
These ancient Mexicans worshiped the dog and the wolf. The hybrid was likely much like the character they lauded in the warrior. The warrior was civilized in his manner during times of peace and as savage as a wild animal in times of war. That dichotomy was celebrated when these hybrids were used for these ceremonial arrangements.
Perhaps one could find evidence ancient North American dogs were actually hybrids. It was suggested that the domestic dogs kept by various peoples of the Southeast were nothing more than tamed red wolves. Black red wolves were very common, which is why they had the archaic scientific name Canis niger.
However, all the studies I’ve seen suggest that New World domestic dogs from both the Pre-Columbian and modern era have predominantly or entirely Old World ancestry.
More work needs to be performed in examining the genetics of these New World dogs.
I suspect that some “dogs” from South America might actually be domesticated versions of South American wild dogs, as was the case with the Perro Yagan, the domesticated culpeo of Tierra del Fuego.
The intentional hybridization of Mexican wolves and domestic dogs at Teotihuacan shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone. We have evidence of wolf hybridization in the origin of certain Finnish and Scandinavian breeds. To find archeological evidence of hybridization in Mexico is just more evidence that dogs and wolves do not represent distinct species.
They represent the beautiful and wondrous diversity that is the species we call Canis lupus. From two-pound chihuahuas that fit nicely in handbags to giant bone crushing wolves that lived in Alaska during the Pleistocene, this species has had the ability to occur in some many different shapes and sizes.
The people of Teotihuacan were probably a little amazed when their domestic bitches bred wolves and produced puppies. Such a crossbreeding from such different looking animals would have been fascinating– almost to the point that it would have required a divine explanation.
And once that explanation would have been put in place, it wouldn’t have been very long before some priesthood would come up with a need to use them for ceremonial purposes.
***
According to Art Daily, some of the remains are from dog-coyote hybrids and to crosses with wolfdogs and coyotes, so intentional wolf and dog crosses were not the only Canis hybrids these people were creating for this purpose.
I strongly disagree with the suggestion in the Art Daily piece that pumas (cougars) are more easily domesticated than wolves. We have no domesticated cougars, but we have hundreds of millions of domestic dogs throughout the world. Not all wolves become status seeking machines in captive situations. Adolph Murie had one named Wags that was basically a golden retriever in wolf form.
Posted in dog breeds, tagged Chinese crested dog on December 21, 2010 | 16 Comments »
The show type of these dogs has also changed.
This is a Chinese crested dog named “Hairy King,” who is depicted in W.D. Drury’s British Dogs: Their Points, Selection And Show Preparation (1903):
Posted in dog breeds, tagged dingo, Dingo show dog, show dingo on December 21, 2010 | 3 Comments »
W.D. Drury writes about the show dingoes in British Dogs: Their Points, Selection And Show Preparation (1903) :
Of the Dingos that have been exhibited, Captain Burton a frequent winner about sixteen years since, was unquestionably one of the best. Like many wild animals in confinement, this dog would continue to walk round in a circle for hours together; it was for this reason that he was exhibited loose in an iron cage, as if chained up the chain soon became twisted. In later years Myall has successfully represented the breed on the show-bench. Previous to either of these dogs Lupus was a frequent winner under different judges. The high carriage of tail was a fault in this dog apparent to any one; in addition to this the writer, who owned Lupus for some years, always considered that there was something about the dog not altogether characteristic of the breed, although it would have been very difficult to define exactly what this was. He had no suspicion at the time that the dog, although bred in this country, was not a pure-bred Dingo, as was represented to be the case when he became possessed of it. It was not until some time after the dog had been given away and he was exhibited by his new owner that the writer noticed for the first time one or two small black spots at the root of the tongue. This clearly showed that there was Chinese or Chow-Chow blood in the dog, which readily accounted for the high carriage of tail, as well as for other faults not so easily discernible.
I should note that black spots on the tongue do not always denote chow ancestry. I have known a few pure goldens to have this trait.
Dingoes are not recognized as a purebred. The ANKC does not have a dingo standard, although it did at one time.
It sounds perverse that anyone would want to show a dingo. This is a creature that is the result of natural selection, not the result of selective breeding. Showing such an animal gives dishonor to its nature, denying its due respect as part of Australia’s native fauna.
Althugh dingoes are feral domestic dogs, they have been living free of human selective breeding for perhaps 4,000 years.
Instead of ch0w-chow, I think it is more likely that Myall was an alpine dingo, which have evolved a thicker coat to live in the colder places on the continent, such as the Snowy Mountains.
Posted in wild dogs, wildlife, wolves, tagged coyote, coyote attack on December 21, 2010 | 3 Comments »
From WGNTV:
Authorities in Wheaton are warning residents after a group of coyotes attacked a small dog there.
It happened December 16 during the late evening hours at a home on Marywood Trail.
The dog’s owner heard it yelping in the backyard and saw three coyotes attacking it.
As the pet owner ran outside the three coyotes ran to the back of the yard and the owner yelled at them causing them to leave.
The dog, a Bichon, suffered several bite wounds and was treated by a veterinarian and released.
Residents are reminded that small pets and small children should always be monitored by an adult when outdoors.
Last month a dog was attacked and killed by a coyote in Wheaton.
Just keep in mind that coyotes attack and kill foxes in the wild.
They do because foxes are edible, and they do it eliminate competitors. Coyotes and foxes both eat mice and rabbits and thus compete for the same prey species.
A coyote would view a Bichon as nothing more than a red fox with curly white hair.
So why not attack it?
Read Full Post »
« Newer Posts - Older Posts »