A few days ago, this image was posted to my Facebook timeline, and I didn’t really look at it too closely.
This was clearly an image from a nineteenth century German boar hunt, and the dogs used in the hunt were bullenbeissers.
Bullenbeissers were the rough bulldogs of Germany that were used in much the same as their English counterparts were. (Somewhat heretically, I don’t believe the bullenbeissers are extinct, but I will leave that to another post.)
England had to transform its native bulldogs into “civilized” creatures relatively early on. Bull-baiting and dog fighting were made illegal in the early nineteenth century, and there was no practical purpose for having the rough bulldog type around.
Of course, Germany held onto its big game for far longer than Great Britain did, and in the old days, many German nobles would go on boar hunts like this one. These rough bulldogs had a much longer life as working dogs than their British counterparts.
This particular kind of hunt is called Sauhatz.
I knew that Sau was a cognate that means female pig (sow).
Hatz, however, was a word that had me a bit confused, so I contacted my resident German language expert. She believed the word Hatz was derived from “hetzen,” a word that means to bait, hound, or tear into.
I thought Hatz was more appropriately translated as coursing, and my German language expert found that Hatz does mean coursing.
What we call hog hunting with catch dogs is called “sow coursing” in German!
So now we know what the caption, but what about the creatures in it.
As I noted earlier, the vast majority of the dogs in the image are bullenbeissers, but there are two dogs that are shaggy.
The exact identity of these dogs is actually even more interesting than bullenbeissers.
These dogs are Saufinders, (“sow searchers”).
They are sort of a rough schnauzer or terrier type dog that may have played some role in the development of the giant schnauzer and the Airedale.
The saufinder was described in Charles Hamilton Smith’s The Natural History of Dogs (1839) as follows:
In Germany, the Saufinder, or Boarsearcher, is a large rough terrier dog, employed to rouse the fiercest beasts of the forest from their lair in the thickest underwood, and they never fail to effect the purpose by their active audacity and noisy clamour. They are usually of a wolfish grey-brown, with more or less white about the neck and breast, and a well fringed tail curled over the back; having in all probability in them a cross of the Pomeranian dog, which may have increased their stature and their caution (pg. 207).
It seems the saufinders would have flushed the boar from the undergrowth, where the bullenbessers would have run it down. Bullenbeissers, like all true bulldogs, were bred for their gameness, and they would have thought of nothing as they charged the boar.
I should also note that the “Pomeranian dog” that Hamilton Smith mention here is actually not the little spitz we call Pomeranians, but the relatively large spitz that is the ancestor of that dog. It used to be common in Baltic region of Germany, where Pomerania is located.
These sorts of hunts speak to a time when Europe was much wilder than it is now. Germany, which always lay between Eastern and Western Europe, is always exposed to wild creatures wandering in from Poland or the Czech Republic.
Great Britain and Ireland could massacre all their wolves, bears, and boar, but Germany is on the same landmass as Russia, one of the wildest places in the world.
So big game hunting remained a past time in Germany many, many years longer than it did in the British Isles.
The British did their big game hunting in the colonies. The Germans did theirs in their forests.
Breeds that became refined and the deformed by the dog fancy in England remained functional across the North Sea.
So while the British were doing bizarre walking races with their bulldogs, the Germans were killing boars with theirs.








Probably not killing boars but rather catching them. They look a lot like my Otto, but they are probably bigger. Here is otto trying to “catch” a sheep:
It was almost 90 degrees that day.
Actually they just freed a herd of 8 wisent in Germany yesterday (I think..). They are trying to reintroduce the biggest land mammal of Europe. :)
The airedale’s immediate ancestors included otterhounds crossed with terriers. The airedale was, subseqently, one of the breeds utilsed by the wermacht, for example in the once only task of setting off mines, “achtung, minen” not being quite within their vocabulary.
The Saufinder was often kept in the UK during the nineteenth century. They were called “Russian terriers” and were popular in Scotland as guard dogs.
Of course we know too well for what purpose the German forces in WW2 used their own famous breed, the GSD.
[…] « Sauhatz […]
Quick question.
Why are dogs bred to fight with much larger heavily armed animals (e;g boar/bulls ect) short coated?
It would seem to me that a good think coat could save them from a bit of injury.
As an example my gsd and my friends staffi jumped through the same bared wire fence today. Gsd lost some hair, staffi lost some skin!
Adam
That’s a good question. I think the goal was just to breed for gameness and for jaw strength. Most catch dogs are molossers, which in Europe almost always means short-coated.
Looking at the hygene of that time, I doubt they had combs (and/or the time or will) to brush long and thick-coated dogs regularly. A heavy coat that isn’t taken care of, will become matted. These tangles then would result in a higher risk of injury when hunting.
Maybe that could be a reason…
Neat looking dogs–I look forward to your future posts on the bullenbeisers.
Thanks Scottie
I wondered if ti was related to heat lose? E;g a molosser seems unable to lose heat as quick as a long faced dog by panting so maybe a short coat helped that?
Adam