One of the most interesting things about the American right these days is how openly they embrace all sorts of intrigues and conspiracies. Perhaps the most absurd is the one about the government intentionally causing tornadoes to bring about both socialism and the New World Order!
But this stuff is actually old hat.
Anyone who has ever followed predator reintroduction politics in Western countries knows that conspiracy theories are rampant among those who oppose predator reintroduction.
These sentiments are well-known in the American West, where wolves are accused of killing everything, including grizzly bears.
But it’s not just confined to the United States, zoologist Lars Thomas writes about the situation in Denmark, which currently under an invasion of wolves wandering up from Germany. By “invasion,” I mean the odd dispersing young wolf has crossed through Schleswig-Holstein into the Jutland Peninsula. Thomas writes:
Wolves have been a big issue in Denmark for several months now – for the first time in 200 years we now have wolves living in our little country – two of them to be exact. But unfortunately all the loonies have started to come out of the woodwork as well. Some people seem to have their knowledge of wolves from the tales of the Brothers Grimm, and we have been subjected to all kinds of paranoid and hysterical ramblings from people who are now too frightened to take a walk in their local wood, from politicians who are certain the wolves have been released by biologists as part of some kind of underhanded scheme to suppress people living in rural areas.
That’s exactly what we have over here.
And it’s not just confined to the West.
In my home state, we have little weekly newspapers that include local columns. Most of these are just ramblings about one’s neighbors have been up to, and if you’re not in the community, you really don’t get all the intricacies and vagaries that are contained in the lines. Most talk about how many people were at the community church.
Very few get political.
In my home county, there is one of these weekly columns that does get political. It’s basically all the local stories mixed the distillations from the bizarre World Net Daily website. It also includes examples of great zoological erudition.
The snow went away and the turkey buzzards returned and the spring peepers are now peeping. Speaking of buzzards, one fellow noted that one of the invasive, non-native black buzzards had a wingspan of 56″. The black buzzards pick out the eyes of newborn calves, lambs, etc. and also target people.
Calling New World vultures “buzzards” is one of those Americanisms that drives me batty. It’s on the level of Canadians calling a Richardson’s ground squirrel a “pocket gopher,” when it’s clearly not a gopher at all. It’s a squirrel, not really all that different from a prairie dog, which is also a ground squirrel.
But there are so many, many errors here. Black vultures are native to the Virginias. However, they are very uncommon west of the Blue Ridge Mountains, which is where 99.9 percent of West Virginia is located. (John Denver never looked at a map.)
In recent years, there have been a few vagrant flocks of black vultures that have popped up here and there. The only ones I’ve ever seen here were in a tree at the edge of a pasture just outside the little town of Glenville, West Virginia in the spring of 2005. There were about a dozen of them, and of these, two were walking around in the open where I could get a good glimpse of them as I drove by.
Many people assume that because black vultures do engage in predatory behavior and do sometimes target livestock, such as newborn lambs and calves, that they are larger than the much more common turkey vulture. However, in reality, turkey vultures tend to be slightly larger than black vultures. A turkey vulture can have a wingspan of up to 72 inches, so a vulture with a wingspan of 56 inches would be a smaller vulture than normal.
And it probably would be a black vulture.
And yes, they do prey on lambs and calves, and depredations by black vultures on lambs in Texas Hill country have been well-documented as a major problem for sheep producers.
However, they don’t target people.
You’d have to be quite paranoid to think that at any moment a giant bird is going to drop out of the sky and carry you away.
As African-derived primates, this is a fear for which we had some justification in our evolutionary past. The famous Taung child was believed to have been killed by a prehistoric African crowned eagle, whose relatives still hunt monkeys in Africa today.
But for modern Americans to fear a vulture that only attacks newborn calves and lambs is probably one of the most absurd things I’ve ever heard. Do you realize how much bigger a person is than a black vulture?
Of course, he doesn’t leave his paranoia with the “black buzzards,” the avian black helicopters.
No, he thinks Eastern coyotes, which wandered in here from New England and Eastern Canada after cross-breeding with relict populations of wolves, were actually introduced by the insurance companies in an attempt to reduce deer-related collisions with automobiles.
The other day a cattleman went out to check on his herd and noticed that one of his favorite cows, who happened to be expecting, was missing. He went on a hunt and found her with a fine new calf in the woods but she and the calf were worn out as three coyotes were circling looking for a tasty meal. A Mr. Remington equalized one of the exotic varmints and the other two fled the scene as they knew they would have an allergic reaction to hot lead. Someone else noted that they trapped one that had an ear tag that said “Property of State Farm Insurance”.
Coyotes are not “exotic varmints” at all. During the Pleistocene, large coyotes were common in West Virginia, and there is at least some historical evidence to suggest that some form of coyote may have existed in the Eastern US before being extirpated with the wolves.
And if anything, the coyotes haven’t done a very good job at reducing deer populations.
And this fact, of course, wasn’t missed by The Creston News.
One local resident saw one of the wolves that had been turned lose locally. He tried to shoot it but the shot was too long and the varmint escaped. One fellow noted that someone in the DNR was given millions by insurance companies to turn the wolves loose to kill the deer that were causing car wrecks. Earlier they had tried the coyotes but they didn’t do the job well enough.
So now we have wolves!
(We actually don’t).
This sort of folk zoology is what I call the Dale Gribble school. It’s not based upon science. Instead, it’s based upon a certain amount of paranoia that experts, who are suspected of being Marxists or liberals or Illuminati types, are using predator reintroduction to end the rural way of life.
Rural life in America and Western Europe has essentially been destroyed.
So few people in this countries live in rural areas that it is difficult to understand why people are so against predators.
Part of the reasons are rational: Coyotes, wolves, and black vultures do kill stock, and in some areas, wolves and coyotes have been implicated in reducing the populations of some prey species.
But these reasons take on a theater of the absurd when they get mixed in with rural cultural politics.
Many people in traditional rural areas see their entire world falling apart before their very eyes.
It’s outsider liberals in the cities who want to take their guns, let the gays marry, and reject Christianity and “family values.”
The predators become scapegoats for that anger.
And the animals as biological entities simply are not seen for what they are.
They are seen for what they represent.
Hippies.
Yuppies.
And Ecothugs who just want to end all that is decent in the world.
It is nothing more than the culture wars’ ecological front.





I do not agree with ranchers blaming wolves, bears, cougars and coyotes preying on their livestock, because if some livestock is killed, it is cost of doing business. I have been jobless for over 6 months during my 20 years of career. I have lost about $90K in my salary in terms of today’s dollars. That is my cost of doing a salaried job. I don’t think an average farmer has lost livestock totaling that amount to predators. It is more noise than actual facts talking.
In my country (Switzerland) the farmers loose a lot more livestock because they just let them loose on the alps and they fall of some cliff, than from being killed by predators. ;)
Haha, the “ear tag-comment” made me laugh so hard. That’s just hilarious!!
Funny how the same stupid stories evolve around the world. Here people used to say that the bearded vulture carries of infants.
Do the locals actually believe hyperbola in the local weekly fish wrap? Or is it all part of having a bogey man to scare little kids, and the well-understood phenomenon of newspaper guys making a mountain out of a molehill to get attention? I think it was PT Barnum who said “No one ever lost a dollar underestimating the intelligence of the American public” (or was it HL Menken) ….but entertaining stupid notions is different from acting on them.
Wow, those are some truly impressive cooked-up paranoid scenarios. I hadn’t run across anything like that, beyond the usual griping about coyotes.
When I last spent some time back home, Radford (also west of the Blue Ridge) had what was apparently the second biggest black vulture roost in the country, with a good number of turkey vultures joining them. I don’t know if it’s still there, but they had been right over the mountain we lived on, around the creek there, for several years in 2008. (I never walked down there to look around, because of the guano, vulture stench, and probably nest protecting behavior.) I enjoyed going out to watch them flocking together and dancing back in, of an evening. But, though you usually don’t see as many as turkey vultures in that part of the New River Valley, there are always some, and I never heard anybody suggesting they were either invasive or purposely introduced. It sounds like y’all don’t get as many, not even that far away. The idea of one being able to seriously hurt or even carry off a human is unbelievably ludicrous.
But, indeed, making sense is very low on the list of priorities there. You’d still hope they could come up with better stories, which at least show some effort at plausibility, or even connection to observable reality. Though insulting other people’s intelligence is far from the main problem with the Gribbles, it’s still irritating.
For clarification:
In the west:ground squirrels = “gophers”; Geomyidae = “pocket gophers”. We don’t call ground squirrels or prairie dogs “pocket gophers”.
I don’t even think you have the real pocket gophers either. We don’t have them here.
Some people call chipmunks “ground squirrels,” which is far more accurate than calling a Richardson’s ground squirrel a gopher.
And wapiti are not elk!
We have them. Livestock owners try to set out poisons for them.
Aha! So you you must be in on it too. (Gotta watch them commie, pinko. liberal atheists like an introduced black buzzard.)