German shepherds are one of the most common breeds in the world. I am not opposed to people keeping them and breeding them. Some of these dogs are wonderful family pets. Others are superior law enforcement dogs.
But what I do oppose is total hypocrisy in providing analysis about different breeds of dog.
I have not mentioned on this space before, but I am deeply skeptical of the research put out by Merritt Clifton of Animals 24-7. Not only does he get a lot of breed history wrong– his sloppy use of the term “molosser” is enough for me to question anyone’s expertise about dogs– but he actually engages in pseudoscientific claims about the behavior of breeds he happens to like.
Most people know Clifton for his tireless campaign to prove to the world that “pit bulls” are walking time bombs that are just about to explode at any moment. Anyone who questions him has been targeted as a “pit bull apologist” or a “pit bull nutter.”
But Clifton himself is one hell of an apologist. Just not with pit bulls.
German shepherds are herding dogs, bred for generations to guide and protect sheep. In modern society, they are among the dogs of choice for families with small children, because of their extremely strong protective instinct. They have three distinctively different bites: the guiding nip, which usually does not break the skin; the grab-and-drag, to pull a puppy or lamb or child away from danger, which is as gentle as emergency circumstances allow; and the reactive bite, usually in defense of territory, a child, or someone else the dog is inclined to guard. The reactive bite usually comes only after many warning barks, growls, and other exhibitions intended to avert a conflict. When it does come, it is typically accompanied by a frontal leap for the wrist or throat.
Because German shepherds often use the guiding nip and the grab-and-drag with children, who sometimes misread the dogs’ intentions and pull away in panic, they are involved in biting incidents at almost twice the rate that their numbers alone would predict: approximately 28% of all bite cases, according to a recent five-year compilation of Minneapolis animal control data. Yet none of the Minneapolis bites by German shepherds involved a serious injury: hurting someone is almost never the dogs’ intent.
There are several Clifton’s claims. The first is he conflates herding dogs with livestock guardian dogs. Herding dogs really don’t guard sheep, and the German shepherd’s ancestors were herding dogs. Instead, they engage in predatory behavior that is modified through selective breeding and training. Everyone who lives in a rural area knows that untrained collie-types are a major problem for people keeping sheep and goats. With no training to modify their behavior, they often surplus kill stock. Livestock guardian dogs, by contrast, bond with the stock and protect them. They are selected against exhibiting predatory behavior, and although these dogs sometimes do become predators of livestock, it is not something that anyone would breed for or tolerate within those strains. With herding dogs, though, it is often a tricky balance between herding and hunting.
Note that I said the German shepherd’s ancestors were bred for herding. The modern GSD has not been bred exclusively for this behavior for over a century. If you want an idea of what the original GSD was like, you will have to go to eastern Germany’s Harz Mountains and look for a mid-sized herding dog called Harzer fuchs, which means “Harz fox.” GSD were partially developed from the Thuringian sheepdog, and the Harz Mountains extend into Thurginia. This dog is actually an active herding breed, but Germany itself has many regional variants of sheepdog. This one just happens to look a lot like the standard German shepherd and is probably similar to the Thuringian type of dog that was crossed into the GSD.
The dog we call a German shepherd dog today, though, has undergone a radical transformation from the sheepdog. One cannot ignore that the dog we call the GSD today was largely the brainchild of a German cavalry officer named Max von Stephanitz. Stephanitz used prick-eared sheepdogs from southern and Eastern Germany, and very quickly began to standardize them and develop them as generalist working dogs. He founded the Verein für Deutsche Schäferhunde in 1899, and his club began developing the breed as the ultimate working dog. There was a heavy emphasis on breeding the dogs for personal protection and military purposes, and a strong selection away from bite inhibition behavior.
German shepherds bite people. His decision to arbitrarily create three categories of German shepherd bite is just weaseling. No credible ethologist or animal behaviorist would recognize these distinctions. GSD have been bred for personal protection and law enforcement. When they bite, it has nothing to do with herding. I bet there aren’t 200 GSD in all of North America that are used for herding stock, but there are thousands that are bred for protection work and sport and for law enforcement purposes.
What Clifton has done is really good example of legitimizing violence. German shepherds are generally thought of as dogs belonging to the police or a good conservative family, while pit bulls are the dogs of the nonwhite underclass. When a pit bull bites, it is a thug dog. When a German shepherd bites, it is the good shepherd.
In essence, the German shepherd is the equivalent of ” the good guy with a gun” we often hear right wing extremists talk about.
Clifton is treated as an expert on dog bite issues. I don’t know why. I will leave it to more qualified people to make analysis about pit bulls, but I can tell you that German shepherds should not be given a free pass when it comes to dog bite issues.
I am not an expert, but I do know enough about dogs to know when someone is just making stuff up.
Clifton is not giving an intellectually honest answer when he gives his German shepherd apologetics.
I write this not as someone who wants laws against German shepherds, but I can tell you that everything Clifton does is about making law on pit bulls and other “molossers,” which, I’ve pointed out, is actually bogus term.
All I am saying is consult the ethology literature on herding behavior, and read the actual history of German shepherd dogs. They are derived from herders, which is true, but they haven’t been bred exclusively for that behavior in well over a century. A German shepherd is a dog that has been bred to bite people, preferably under control and training. But an untrained, reactive GSD can do a lot of damage to person, just as any big dog could.
____________________________________________________________________________
*Clifton, Merrit. “Dog bites and maimings, US and Canada: September 1982 to December 31, 2014.” Animals 24-7.





Totally agree, although my experience has been that many of the modern GSD (Australian and US varieties – those dogs with the sad hyena look) have been ‘dumbed down’ quite a bit, or maybe that’s just here in Australia. We just don’t really see the really aggressive German Shepherd dogs any more. However, the Czech German Shepherd variety seems now to be the type that is really used in police work here. Very similar in looks and size to the Belgian Malinois. We hear about a lot of pit bull/staffy cross biting incidents, but I just cannot remember any GSD bites being in the news for quite a long time now.
Well, they were banned in your country for a long time for fear they would breed with the dingoes and make a superwolf.
In the US, we have a lot of good GSD, but there are more than a few really aggressive dogs. We also have a lot of problems with the spines and hips and the sloping back.
Yes the were banned for a long time, the idea that there would be a super predator in the bush was something to be really feared. Foxes were an introduced species here and have done a huge amount of damage (and it is still ongoing) to the native wild life as well as farm animals, so the thought of a super predator was really something to avoid at all costs, as well as the connotation of the name Alsation Wolf dog or German Shepherd which wasn’t too acceptable in those racist days. Thankfully, those days are past, or I hope that they are. However, the stupidity of that way of thinking is mind boggling considering that our super predator in the bush is, and was, the Eastern Brown snake which are everywhere, even in the suburbs and deadlier than any super wolf.
People need to take Clifton, Merrit with a glass of warm water and a mouthful of salt. Then spew the stuff out.
Thank you for addressing Clifton’s less than honest boo yah and academic fraud he uses in his attempts to completely vilanize the pit bull dog. He does so under the guise that almost every bite must be from a pit bull…”or a close mix” , as he calls it . Been dealing with his bogus stats and misidentifying breeds for a looooong time! Thanks again….
He’s pretty much a complete fraud. And he knows less than zero about dogs in any sense. As for his crusade to prove “pit bulls” are the most dangerous dog in the history of civilization.. well, I have a variety of screen captures of dogs he calls “pit bulls” which have little (if any) APBT/AST/SBT component..
Quite aside from the subject of GSDs and Cliftom Merritt, it is true that not every instance of a dog using its mouth/teeth should be classified as a “bite”. A good retriever has such excellent discrimination or “bite inhibition” that it can pick up and carry a duckling or a kitten without any damage whatever, The same dog can slay a groundhog with one grab-and-shake, or rip the pants off a burglar, given reason to do so. On the other hand, certainly, some dogs seem not to have or to use that degree of discrimination. Particularly in breeds selected for their “stopping power”.
Besides Clifton’s laughable personal, biased, and random assessment of bites and behavior according to his highly questionable breed IDs, his “statistical” information is even worse.
How is it that Clifton’s self-described “meticulous” research has failed to uncover an additional 20+ fatalities that were attributed to German Shepherd dogs that can be found by using his own primary research source (i.e., the media) ?
Now of course, we have no idea if these dogs were truly GSDs, just like we have no idea if the dogs he has labeled “pit bulls” are truly pit bulls or just mutts.
But, using his own “methodology” of scanning newspapers and taking their word for breed ID, how is it he “missed” more than 20 cases of people being killed by GSD type dogs. (His numbers as of Nov. 2014 show 27 people killed by GSD type dogs.) But if you research newspaper archives you will find more than 47 people killed by GSD type dogs.
And don’t give me that “he excluded guard dogs and police dogs.” No police agency trains their dog to kill a 6-week old baby (one of the fatalities Clifton has conveniently excluded – oh, wait, maybe the dog was trying to herd the 6 week old infant and the 100 or so bites were only “nips”).
Thanks for your article! I don’t speak english very well but i love your site and expecially dogs :)