Feeds:

Archive for the ‘dog breeding’ Category

Did Ben Franklin import a closed registry Gordon setter? Another delusion of the closed registry cult

A tricolored retrieving setter, perhaps very similar to the type Benjamin Franklin imported.

A tricolored retrieving setter, perhaps very similar to the type Benjamin Franklin imported.

On Facebook, a friend of mine posted this bizarre rant from a purebred dog breeder:

“I DON”T call freedom a choice to do whatever!!!!!!… Don’t get confused….. Ben Franklin worked for freedom— but he worked at having a purebred Gordon setter brought from England and bred them.. to preserve something special. the Freedom was to have a choice to own a dog so let’s get this Freedom of Choice thing straight… where did you all go to school???? what happened to parents teaching their children the real meaning of this slogan??? .. not to breed mutts/designer dogs on a whim and to see how much money you might get …Dogs were bred for a purpose for a certain breed to have that characteristic…. Ben and all the rest of us spent millions of dollars to insure something true and honest…. how dare you or anyone else decide to take our Freedom of choice away from US..it is not ok to breed this way.. it shows lack of purpose, lack of loyalty.. lake of knowledge and lack of you wanting to spend money to support a breed to insure it’s Freedom to exist…. you might as well say we have the freedom to poop on the street…or anything else we choose to have the freedom we feel like doing…..”

Well, freedom to choose means the freedom to do whatever. I don’t know how you can twist the meaning of the words to mean to change the meaning to fit whatever totalitarian delusions that one might have. It’s like the people who tell you they are for freedom, but at the same time, they tell you that this country is based upon Christian values.

Those two things do not compute!

As I’ve noted before, the dogs are one of the many ersatz religions that no exists in this post-Christian culture in which we now live. I am fine with the decline of organized religion, but what has replaced it is not a culture of reason.

What has replaced it is many irrational, tribal cults which allow people with totalitarian impulses to act out their pathologies on others. It’s one reason I’m not a joiner. I love dogs, but I’m very dismayed and continually disappointed by dog people.

So in that crazy rant we have several claims. We have the hilariously irony-deficient claim to be a champion of freedom while telling others what to do, and we have a claim from history that could at best be called a delusion. And at its very worst, we would have to call it an utter misrepresentation of the history.

The claim is that founding father Benjamin Franklin imported a Gordon setter from England, and the implication is that he imported a closed registry setter that comes in only black and tan.

Of course, that type of dog didn’t exist when Ben Franklin was alive!

The Gordon setter, which should be called the Scottish setter, is actually derived from the old crouching setter of Britain, a dog that was the quintessential British fowling dog that  would crouch before game birds hidden the brush or corn. A hawk would be flown over the birds to keep them from flying and a net would be thrown over the crouching dog and the hunkered birds.

This type of dog became very popular in British Isles during the early modern period, and it was also sent to the colonies in North America in droves. In America, we developed this setter dog into a sort of HPR, which we would use to point grouse, retrieve ducks from cold water, and track wounded deer.

In Britain, there were many, many different strains of setter, of which only a handful remain. The Dukes of Gordon did breed a type of setter in Scotland, but it is laughable to assume that this was a closed registry breed.  All records of the setters of Gordon kennels I’ve read from that time period talk about the dogs being tricolored, black, white, and tanned like a Dobermann.

And it was well-known that the in the eighteenth century, the 4th Duke of Gordon was always breeding his stock to those of other nobles.

In his excellent Gundogs: Their Past, Their Performance and Their Prospects (2013), Col. David Hancock mentions that this fourth Duke of Gordon coveted the blood of Thomas Coke’s setters, and it was Coke’s setters that were the foundational stock for his particular strain. I have seen no evidence that Coke’s setters were anything other than the more typical predominantly white setters that were always common in England. (Coke’s estate was in Norfolk, nowhere near Scotland).

It is also well-known that Gordon setters have a bit of collie blood, which is always mentioned in all the historical texts of the breed, but no one seems to acknowledge what this means. It means that the Gordon setter as a working gun dog didn’t become a gun dog through being a closed registry breed.

It became a great gun dog through the continuous desire to innovate. This desire to experiment and innovate is what made British Empire the world’s leader in agricultural improvement.

As soon as closed registries were established, this ability to innovate and experiment was taken away.

And we all know that Benjamin Franklin was among the leading intellectuals of the world at the time. He was clearly a man of science and reason, and if he could read and understand the modern concepts of population genetics, he would be among the foremost opponents of this closed registry system.

He imported a British setter because they were great gun dogs. They became great gun dogs because the British were willing to innovate and experiment with bloodlines.

It is that freedom that should be celebrated and encouraged in the world of dogs, but unfortunately, it goes against all the totalitarian impulses that exist in the dog world that has since developed.

For the sake of the dogs, dog breeders should be reading up on the science and understanding the real history of their dogs.

They shouldn’t be wasting their time with pointless myths that are ultimately harmful to the animals they claim to love.

But that means that some grand poobah of yore was wrong somewhere and that modern breed mandarins might have to be humble and accept that they cannot control everything that goes on with their breed.

The first idea that must be trashed is that closed registries and blood purity for blood purity’s sake are ultimately good values. Unfortunately, that is the basic religious tenet of the modern dog fancy, and  it is almost impossible to have a rational discussion with people who adhere to such poppycock.

It is this religious belief that is causing so much misery in the world of dogs– higher incidence of inherited diseases and winnowed away gene pools are not good things.

And it is also stymieing innovation.

We could be producing better working dogs for a variety of tasks if only it were acceptable to cross strains. Imagine West Siberian laikas that natural retrieve because of a golden retriever that was crossed in a few generations before. Imagine a cocker spaniel-sized Labrador that easily fits in a canoe that got its small size from a simple outcross to a small working spaniel.

It is this kind of freedom in the world of dogs that we should all be fighting for.

But unfortunately, too many “freedom lovers” in the world of dogs really don’t want it.

It crosses their fundamentalist beliefs, and they will having nothing of it.

But like all bullies, they ought to be put in their place. Totalitarians have no use fighting for freedom.

Freedom means freedom to do as one would like, and don’t be fooled by the demagogues who apparently can’t understand that simple fact.

 

Read Full Post »

The past 100 years have not been kind to the pekingese in the West

Ti Ti, a pekingese painted by Maud Earl in 1913.

Ti Ti, a pekingese painted by Maud Earl in 1913. 

And here are photos of the winner of the Westminster Kennel Club dog show in 2012, Ch. Palacegarden Malachy:

palacegarden malachy

palacegarden malachy profile

The great “breed improvement” contests that have gone on for the past century have certainly done their magic.

What was once a pretty hardy little dog is now a little lion trying to be a marmoset.

It’s now so short-legged that it waddles around when it walks, and we’ve now seen the creation of the ultimate heat-retaining little dog that has both the extremely distorted respiratory/cooling system of the flat-faced dog and a thick undercoat of something we’d expect to see from the arctic.

I don’t know how sane people allowed this to happen, but my word, it is has.

 

 

Read Full Post »

Outcross program to save the Norwegian lundehund announced

lundehund puffin

The Norwegian lundehund is one of the most inbred dog breeds in the closed registry system, and I have questioned the wisdom of including this breed into a dog population management culture that celebrates blood purity over health and good science.

Because of its peculiar adaptations for traversing rocky cliffs and squeezing down puffin burrows, there is a tendency in this breed to believe that it is too unique to have new blood added. If you add new blood, the dogs cease being lundehunds– which is actually theological reasoning and is unfortunately all too common in the world of purebred dogs.

All lundehunds alive today derive from six founders, and five of these were all from the same mother.

That is not a very large founding population, and when a breed is placed into the closed registry system and bred to a particular standard, a lot of genetic diversity will be squandered. If you start out with a population that is already quite small, the effects of such breeding practices will be magnified.

This breed has a condition known as “lundehund syndrome,” which is just a shorthand for a variety of gastro-intestinal disorders that affect this breed, which can range from mild issues of malabsorption of nutrients to cancer of the intestines. It is estimated that anywhere from 40 percent to 100 percent of this breed suffer from some variant of the disorder.

There is definitely some sort of genetic basis for the syndrome, but no one has been able to say what might be done to rectify the problem.

Further, the breed is also suffering from a general inbreeding depression, which means the breed is eventually on its way to extinction unless something is done. The breed is rapidly losing its fertility, and without new blood, they may simply become impossible to breed.

And the Norsk Lundehund Klubb (Norwegian Lundehund Club in Norway) has decided to begin an outcross program to save the breed.

The club recently announced that a lundehund had been bred to Norrbottenspets, a small treeing spitz from Norway that is known for its prowess in treeing forest grouse. The club’s announcement reads as follows:

The Norwegian Lundehund Club has initiated a project to increase the genetic diversity of Norwegian Lundehund. This is absolutely adamant now as this very special dog breed is on the verge of extiction (sic). Norwegian Lundehund is one of the most inbred dogbreeds (sic) in the world, and it shows indications of reduced fertility. In the long run, inbreeding depression might be the end of this wonderful dog breed, and we cannot sit still and watch this happen. The first cross has taken place, a Norwegian lundehund male and a female of Norbottenspets. This had to be done by insemination as the male, unfortunately, was too small. The puppies that we hope will be borne in two months time, will be registered at the Norwegian Kennel Club in an x-register, and they will not be sold on the open marked. For all of you that own a lundehund, keep up your breeding programme, as there will be many years until any individual that is a result of crossbreeding will be introduced in the true breed. We hope to save the breed, but we need your help to keep up the numbers of truebred (sic) lundehunds over the years to come. More information will be available on our homepage and fb within a few days.

So when a breed is faced with extinction through poor population management, the only solution is to make radical steps to save it.

Of course, these steps aren’t radical at all. If people were not so accepting of the tenet of faith that blood purity at all costs is a virtue in domestic dog breeds, this breed would be as healthy and viable as any other.  New blood would be brought in every couple of generations, and the population would be carefully managed.

But this concept– which is essentially without controversy in the scientific animal husbandry literature as well as the literature on population genetics– is utter heresy in the world of dogs.

To cross breeds is the ultimate sin– something that only done when there is no alternative.

It is really sad that this breed had to come to this point before the Norbottenspets outcross program was accepted.

But the truth is all of these other breeds are in the same boat. They aren’t moving at exactly the same pace as the lundehund, but they are all moving in this direction slowly but surely.

It really is time to drop the blood purity cult.

It’s just not serving the dogs well.

Period.

Read Full Post »

Inbreeding in American bullies

Source.

I don’t know what it is, but in pit bulls and their derivatives, inbreeding is celebrated.

An American bully is an offshoot of the pit bull, which has been specifically bred to be less aggressive and to have a body that makes them resemble Tasmanian devils. However, there are other breeders of “exotic” bullies that every bit as effed up in conformation as an English bulldog or a show basset hound.

It’s a breed in formation, and because they are breeding for such different phenotype from the general pit bull and bull and terrier type, there is quite a bit of inbreeding going on.

The UKC has recently recognized the American bully as a breed, and the UKC breed standard expressly forbids the “exotic” phenotype— which certainly is a positive.

However, within the subculture, there are many dogs that remain outside the registry, and in many cases, they are very tightly bred to maintain a certain look.

Inbreeding in the established dog fancy has often been celebrated, but within the established breeds, there are many people openly questioning the virtues of such tight breeding. The effects of so much consanguinity have created populations that have genetic loads that are often too difficult manage.

It’s a road to hell that so many dog people want to follow. It’s much easier to sculpt canine flesh using DNA when you’re dealing with breeding populations that are very finite and genetically depauperate.

But as we’ve seen with virtually every closed registry purebred dog, one does not get to select for appearance alone. Not all genes are expressed in the phenotype, and selection away or toward one trait can have very bad consequences for health and temperament.

Even the most educated geneticist or molecular biologist is still ignorant of many aspects how traits are inherited. They will readily admit this to you.

However, from what I’ve seen among “dog people” is there is a tendency to act as if they know things about the genetic composition of a dog that even the most highly-educated scientist would say couldn’t be known.

And this is precisely the danger with “dog people.”

So much damage is being done  in the name of impressing other people.

So many dogs have gone down this path.

And it looks like the America bully is going to race down it– just as the Eurasier and the Cesky terrier have done before.

Breeding a nice “pit bull” that looks like a Tasmanian devil is a far nobler enterprise than breeding dogs for fighting, but it’s not going to be of much use if the dogs wind up with the genetic load problems that all the “fancy” breeds have.

Now would be the time for American bully fanciers to take a hard look at population genetics. It would mean that it would be harder to established distinct type immediately, but it would have very good long-term consequences for the health and vitality of the population.

The time to act is before the gene pool gets all sequestered off, and if the sequestration can be stopped entirely, it would be a great benefit to the dogs.

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

What is an Afghan hound supposed to look like under all that fuzz?

Basically, a dachshund in reverse:  short back and long legs!  Not at all what people would actually want in a coursing hound.

afghan hound standard

 

Of course, the vast majority of Afghan hounds in the West aren’t even thought of as coursing dogs.

They were objects of conspicuous consumption, and no one seriously considered breeding them for anything other than something to look at.

Which is why the dogs look so bizarre.

It’s not a cruel breeding practice like the ones used to create pugs and bulldogs, but it’s one that utterly distorts what this type of dog has been for thousands of years.

The dog fancy is really not concerned with the real world or “preservation.” It’s concerned with what wins dog shows.

This is why the whole concept is faulty in its premise.

 

 

Read Full Post »

Bad pug breeding

Source.

Cuteness is curse.

We’ve pushed this breed to the absolute limit of canine anatomy, and it is going to be next to impossible to bring them back.

Read Full Post »

Breed branding

1901 bull terrier.

1901 bull terrier.  

One of the hardest aspects of doing any research on dog breed history is trying to figure out the nomenclature.

On this blog, I’ve pointed out the words “Newfoundland” and “retriever” were often interchangeable with the words “Labrador” and “St. John’s water dog.”

The fact that the names are not hard-defined breeds as we know them today often leads people astray in their thinking.  For example, I often come across accounts of Chesapeake Bay retriever history that claim that the breed was derived from the Newfoundland dog, and one will often see a photograph of the large Newfoundland breed accompanying the text. Of course, the two dogs that established the retriever culture in Maryland were “Newfoundland” dogs, but they were much more likely dogs of the St. John’s water dog type than the giant Newfoundland variety.

But there is actually an even more difficult breed to figure out from the historical record.

When I say the words “bull terrier,” I’m sure that one’s concept of that breed is the Spuds MacKenzie dog. It’s a dog that is famously white or predominantly white in color with erect ears and an egg-shaped head.

When one reads historical accounts of dogs, one will also run across the term “bull terrier” to describe a dog, but as with the retrievers, the name “bull terrier” was once more general term.

It initially referred to any bulldog and terrier cross, and not all bulldog/terrier crosses were bred for fighting. It also could refer to ratting and go-to-ground terriers that had some bulldog blood. Fox and Jack Russell terriers were all famously derived from a mix that included a bit of bulldog, and the addition of this blood makes some sense. Bulldogs were used for dog fighting, but this ability was much more strongly selected for in bulldog and terrier crosses. If a bulldog was a good fighting dog, then it might make the terrier a bit harder on a fox or rat if bulldog blood was added.

In the nineteenth century, dog fighting was a big deal in English industrial cities. The Black Country region of the West Midlands was an area where lots of men, both working class and gentry, bred fighting dogs from bulldog and terrier crosses.  This area is called the “Black Country” because it was a major coal and steel producing area. The burned coal often left a nasty deposit of black film on the buildings. Industrialization, unionization, and democratization created an industrial class with a bit of disposable income and some leisure time to engage in dog fighting.

This area is just west of Birmingham and includes part of the county of Staffordshire. To any historian of bull and terrier types, these areas should ring a bell. The show variant of the bull terrier we know today, as well as its miniature bull terrier descendant, was developed in Birmingham, and the rougher fighting-bred stock was still common in the English county of Staffordshire, even when the rest of the country had adopted the “white cavalier” as the official bull terrier. The dogs that were derived from that Staffordshire type were called “Staffordshire bull terriers.”

Both of these breeds are derived from essentially the same stock, but one was bred to be a gentleman’s dog that allegedly never started a fight but would gladly finish one when challenged. The other was the nasty pit dog.

The bull terrier that we know today was a creation of an Irish-born dog dealer from Birmingham named James Hinks, who crossed the refined ratting terrier known as the English white terrier with a bulldog. Hinks sold dogs to middle class people, as well as the gentry, and he made a comfortable living doing so.

He is said to have added Dalmatian blood to his crosses to “refine” their bone, but he always slected for a predominantly white bull terrier.

In the United States, there were fighting dogs of this bulldog and terrier cross blood. Pit fighting was popular, not just in the South, where most people associate the custom, but also in New England. Both Massachusetts and Rhode Island were well-known centers for breeding fighting bull terriers. These dogs were almost never pure white in color, and because they were derived from the same crosses as the dogs bred in the Black Country they looked very much like them.  Some may have been exactly this same stock, but it is really hard to determine the exact ancestry of them.

Now, in America, the white bull terrier bred by Hinks became a popular show dog, and the British spread them throughout their empire, but the other kind of bulldog and terrier was still used for fighting.

The white dog became celebrated as the ideal family dog.  It was also promoted as a noble creature that rarely fought and many experts even claimed that it was never a fighting dog. Of course, Hinks himself did match one of his dogs against a traditional Black Country dog. Rawdon Lee wrote about the match between one of Hinks’s dogs, a bitch named Puss, in which she actually killed her opponent:

It was early in the fifties that James Hinks began to cross the patched, heavy-headed bull terrier, used for fighting, with the English white terrier, and in due time he produced dogs handsome enough to make a name for themselves, and able to revolutionise the variety. Some of the old “doggy men ” said this new breed were soft and could not fight. “Can’t they?” said Hinks, when talking to a lot of his London friends at the Holborn Horse Repository dog show in May, 1862. “I think they can.” “Well,” said one of the London school, “let’s make a match.” Hinks, nothing loth, did make a match, and backed his bitch Puss—that day she had won first prize in her class—for £5 and a case of champagne, against one of the short-faced patched dogs similar in weight. The fight came off the same evening at Bill Tupper’s well-known rendezvous in Long Acre. It took Puss half-an-hour to kill her opponent, and so little the worse was she for her encounter that she appeared on the bench next morning, a few marks on her cheeks and muzzle being the only signs of the determined combat in which she had been the principal over night. When accounts of this became bruited abroad, although it was not generally believed, the popularity of the “long faced” dog was established (pg 30-31.)

But that didn’t matter. The bull terrier had already been branded as a refined show dog and family pet. It was seen as being very different from the “pit dogs.”

However, when it was determined that breeding the dogs for white only was doing nothing but encouraging deafness in the strain. In the early twentieth century, a man name Ted Lyon tried to solve this problem through cross-breeding with the Staffordshire-type bull terriers.

American fanciers went nuts over the suggestion. For decades, they promoted the myth that their white dogs were totally distinct from the pit dogs, and because of some political wrangling, were only brought into the bull terrier registry as a separate variety from the white ones.

It was the long-headed and white bull terrier that was the good dog. The evil fighting dog was the shorter-faced dog of many colors.

It is only through branding that the white bull terrier was given high status while its pit dog cousin was given short shrift.

Of course, later on, the indigenous American strains of pit dogs became better established as family pets through much of the earlier part of the twentieth century.

But earlier branding created an entirely arbitrary breed split, which only could have happened through Hinks’s careful branding in the middle part of the nineteenth century.

Bull terriers of the Hinks type are now rarely the target of breed specific legislation, and other descendants of bulldog and terriers, such as Boston terriers and Jack Russells, never have been banned.

Breeding bulldogs to terriers created a type that could be used for a lot of different things, and the term “bull terrier” did not always mean only the dogs of the Hinks type. The Hinks type is just the kind of dog that got established as the fancy Kennel Club dog first, and dog shows and the fancy had a way of promoting this dog as the refined type.

In the histories of the dog fancy, we have tended to ignore the role of dog dealers in defining types. If anything, the dog fancy empowered the dog dealer, and if the dog dealer couldn’t produce the dog that one wanted for the ring, he would make up his own.

The white bull terrier as the white cavalier was a branded type in much the same way that the black wavy-coated retriever was.  These were dogs that no up-and-coming man of means could be without. Never mind that the fighting dogs were of many colors,and that the retrievers of decades before were of a very diverse ancestry.

These dogs were sold as status symbols in much the same way we sell golden and Labrador retrievers as the ideal family dogs and German shepherds as the world’s best guard dogs.

Branding can drive the evolution of dogs in ways we really haven’t explored.  The creation of this egg-headed bull terrier, which was originally just a longer-headed white bull terrier with cropped ears, is really nothing more than lots of selections for a particular “brand” of bull terrier.

In the past 150 years, Westerners have stopped breeding dogs solely for function. We then began a long period of isolating gene pools and heavily selecting within those gene pools. We did this because Western societies became more affluent through industrialization. And industrialization made many dogs obsolete as true working animals. With all these dogs running around and this time and money, we decided to begin playing around with their bloodlines, creating and refining many esoteric types with just as esoteric conformation standards.

Their utility largely came in the brand they came to represent.

This is why most of the “breeds” we have today exist as they do, and this also why we can’t have rational discussions about outcrossing and doing away with closed registries.

To break that boundary is to defy the brand. It was that way when Ted Lyon began crossing Black Country fighting dogs with white cavaliers, and it’s that way now.

We’ve allowed ourselves to get so worked up in breed brands that we’ve lost all sight of what the science of population genetics says about closed registries. It’s as if that science doesn’t exist at all.

The dogs have become prisoners to the symbolism they represent for their owners.

Their only hope is that we can rise above our symbolism and our cultures to breed for something else.

But humans have a hard time rising above their symbols and their culture.

And change will be an uphill battle.

The brands are difficult to overcome.

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Follow