Feeds:

Archive for the ‘Flat-coated retriever’ Category

The Horton Flat-coats

These dogs belonged to a Mr. L. Allen Shuter (no pun intended).  These are some very famous flat-coated retrievers, and they also appear in some of the early golden retriever pedigrees. The flat-coats of this time resembled what I would call working-type golden retrievers. The only obvious difference is that these dogs were black.

These images come from a Country Life Illustrated article that appeared on 10 May 1902:

Ch. Horton Rector

Horton Thyme

Horton Violet. From this photo, one can see she has obviously been nursing puppies. She reminds me of the golden retriever, Ch. Noranby Diana. who lived over a quarter century later.

Horton Violet with her puppies.

Read Full Post »

Another dark golden with brown skin

Source for image.

This particular golden looks like a red flat-coated retriever.

Brown skinned dogs are genetically livers or chocolates that have the e/e genotype that prevents the brown pigment from appearing on the coat.

See earlier post:

 

 

Read Full Post »

Flat-coated retriever with deer trotter

(Source for image)

Read Full Post »

Mr. A.T. Williams and Don of Gerwn

This dog won the retriever stake at the International Gundog League trials in 1904.

His dam was a liver flat-coat named Rust.

His sire was a yellow flat-coat named Lucifer, who was bred by none other than Dudley Marjoribanks, the 1st Baron Tweedmouth.

He was half  “golden retriever.” Golden retrievers didn’t then exist as a breed but were a type of wavy or flat-coated retriever that was starting to gain prominence.

Because of Don’s color and that of his dam, I wonder if Lucifer may have been a brown-skinned yellow. If he had been a black-skinned yellow, Don would have been black.

Of course, Lucifer could have been a black-skinned yellow that carried the brown-skinned gene, but that would mean that the majority of his litter mates would have likely been blacks.

 

 

Read Full Post »

Tar, “a celebrated retriever”

The original image of this dog is from a painting by A. Cooper. It was entitled “Tar, a Celebrated Retriever, the Property of Charles Brett, Esq.”

I have not been able to find anything about this Mr. Charles Brett, other than he was located at West Hill House in Fareham in Hampshire. It lies in between Portsmouth and Southamptom, which are major port cities.

It is not very far from Poole, which is in the neighboring county of Dorset.

Poole, of course, was the home port of virtually every English ship that fished the Grand Banks of Newfoundland.

It was a major port of entry for St. John’s water dogs into England, and it would be expected that we would find a dog like this one in a neighboring county. Or perhaps the dog arrived in either Portsmouth or Southampton as a direct import from Newfoundland.

Most sources suggest that this dog is a flat-coated or wavy-coated retriever– and they actually wouldn’t be wrong. The division between St. John’s water dogs and wavy/flat-coated retrievers and what became Labrador retrievers was quite nebulous.

However, I think it might be reasonable to suggest that Tar was actually a lightly feathered St. John’s water dog from imported stock. His size and build are very similar to what we’d expect from a male of that breed. Judging from the mallard drake at his feet, I would estimate him to be roughly the size of a typical Labrador retriever dog, though maybe just slightly larger– in the 85 pound range. He also possesses white toes and a white chest– both traits that were commonly in the St. John’s breed. He also has a slightly roached back– a trait one sometimes sees in Chesapeake Bay retrievers and curlies. It has been selected against in golden, Labrador, and flat-coated retrievers, but it would be reasonable that the St. John’s breed would have this trait. Perhaps it gave the dogs a bit better swimming posture by allowing the back legs to go a bit deeper in the water and permitting the head to rise a bit more out of the water– thereby allowing the dog a better chance of seeing or smelling that which it was sent to retrieve.

His name is Tar. That could refer to his color, but it also could refer to “Jack Tar,” a common name for a British sailor.  It  is synonymous with the word “seaman,” and giving this dog this particular name might have been a reference to a seaman’s dog.

I cannot find any information on this Mr. Charles Brett, Esquire, of Fareham. My guess is he was involved in some sort of import or export business, for this region was (and still is) a major sea port. He was obviously well to do to have been able to afford a retriever, and the term “esquire” meant that he was of some rank.

I just can’t find out who he was. If you have any info, please pass it along.

But I think Tar was a St. John’s water dog, either recently imported or derived from recent imports.

Of course, he could have been called a “Newfoundland,” a “Labrador,” or a “wavy-coated retriever,” and every one of those distinctions would have been correct.

Read Full Post »

“Recumbent Labrador”

This painting is said to be of a Labrador. We could just as easily call it a wavy-coated retriever or a St. John’s water dog with long hair.

We can tell from the hat on the table that this isn’t a giant dog. In fact, it looks like a golden retriever with border collie markings.

See earlier posts:

Read Full Post »

Rabbit retrievers

Four flat-coats with the day’s kill. If you look closely, you can see the dogs have fetched a rather large pile of rabbits!

This image comes from Country Life Illustrated (28 October 1899). The dog seated next to the largest pile more strongly resembles a golden retriever than a modern flat-coat, which is more evidence that both “golden retriever” and ” modern flat-coated” body types were evident in the original wavy/flat-coated breed.

Retrievers and other dogs in the sporting group are known as “gun dogs” in Europe. That means they hunt game with someone armed with a gun. This game might include birds, but no one would call such dogs “bird dogs,” as we do in the United States. That’s because these dogs are often required to work furred game. Retrievers often pick up rabbits or hares, and in Germany, their HPR’s are used on a wide variety of game, including foxes, boar, and deer.

Shooting rabbits appears a bit too utilitarian to be an activity for a sporting gentlemen of the nineteenth century. However, rabbits were– and still are– actively managed on estates for this purpose. Why did the European rabbit get introduced to Australia?  It wasn’t an accident. It was intentionally introduced as a game animal. (A somewhat bad idea.)

In the tradition of the British battue shoot, the rabbits were driven into shooting range by spaniels while the retrievers sat steady near the shooters. When the rabbits were shot, each retriever was sent separately to fetch the bunnies.

In my part of the world, rabbit hunting is done with beagles– almost exclusively. The beagles are normally run in braces or small packs, and all they do is make the rabbit run. Cottontail rabbits run in a pattern that circles around several brier patches and brush heaps– where the rabbits seek refuge from the dogs. The beagles work the rabbits out of these refuges and make them run around until they come out in the open in front of the hunter’s gun. The beagles don’t retrieve, of course, but they will take to rabbit chases with almost no training. Sight hounds, which are used in more open parts of the world, are totally impractical here. The cover is too heavy for them to run at full speed, and the steep hillsides require dogs that are more sure-footed than the double-suspension gallop can provide.

Using a division of labor among the gun dogs in a shoot was more the sign of British affluence than anything else. The truth is a retriever can easily work as a spaniel, and many spaniels can be taught to retrieve.  One could have cut down on the dogs used in a shoot very quickly, but that wasn’t the point.

Appearance is what mattered, and having separate retrievers and flushers was the proper way.  It was also a good symbol of conspicuous consumption.  More dogs require more training from the keepers, and more dogs require more care. Only people who are truly of means can afford such extravagances.

And that’s the important symbolism:  I have the means to have several specialized dogs, so I am truly a person of worth.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Follow