January 17, 2010 by retrieverman
Posted in Chesapeake bay retriever, dog breeds, working retrievers | 8 Comments
Comments are closed.
| retrieverman on Rottweilers are not bulld… | |
| Earth Whisperer Cons… on World’s most notorious I… | |
| Jen Robinson on Rottweilers are not bulld… | |
| Nuthatch working at… on Bird buffet | |
| retrieverman on Rottweilers are not bulld… |
Nice dog.
(’nuff said.)
Speaking of Chessies, did you read see the article in Nov/Dec Bark about Henry Chapman Mercer?
I didn’t see it, and I’m a bit ashamed that I didn’t.
Because…
I am also in that issue.
I usually read magazines sometime after they arrive in housee, but had seen this soon after it was delivered.
When I was looking through it last week I “found” (SR moment, please) it again. this post reminded me to forward it to you.
I am a spaniel person and not familiar witth retriever field trials and hunt tests.
Will this dog seek and flush upland game for the gun, as well as be a finished nonslip waterfowl retriever?
Chesapeakes can be used as upland game retrievers.
The UKC has a upland game test for retrievers, but the AKC does not.
So that is the dual purpose, or is this a show/field dog?
Yes. This dog is a Dual Champion– one of the few retrievers with this title. He’s also an AFC (Amateur Field Champion, meaning that his owner is not a pro-trainer.)
Very few goldens and Labs within the past 20 years have earned this distinction. I believe there is just one living dual champion golden in Canada.
Chesapeakes are more likely to get this title, because Chesapeakes have not fully split into show and working versions. The standard for the Chessie is, by and large, based upon function (although if you want to read a harsh critique of the Chessie standard, check out Mark Derr’s Dog’s Best Friend.)